Fraud Detection Series 6 based on Albrecht et al., Fraud Examination (6th Edition)
Why Fraud Is Difficult to Detect
Fraud is inherently challenging to identify, as offenders often possess a superior understanding of the organisation’s systems, controls, and vulnerabilities compared to those tasked with oversight. Albrecht asserts that fraudsters intentionally design methods that integrate smoothly with ordinary transactions, producing abnormalities invisible from genuine activities. They exploit loopholes in internal controls, skip procedures, or alter data in ways that leave minimal evidence. Consequently, fraud may persist undetected for extended periods, particularly when the company relies heavily on trust or lacks effective oversight systems.
Albrecht emphasises that fraud generally evolves gradually and progressively. Offenders frequently initiate with minor actions that appear minor and then expand their plans as they develop confidence and sense minimal risk of recognition. This gradual evolution makes fraud challenging to detect, as alterations in financial data or employee conduct may be nuanced and dispersed over time. Moreover, auditors and managers may disregard these initial indicators as they appear to be typical variations or operational irregularities. Once the scam becomes apparent, the damages are frequently considerable, and the underlying system has become increasingly complex.
Human factors play a significant role in the challenges associated with fraud detection. Employees may be reluctant to report suspicious conduct due to fears of punishment, concerns about harming their relationships with coworkers, or uncertainty about what constitutes misconduct. Management may also be reluctant to recognise suspected fraud, as it can adversely reflect on leadership and reveal deficiencies in governance. Moreover, auditors are rarely consistently assigned or prepared to proactively identify fraud; their responsibilities typically centre on assessing financial accuracy rather than uncovering deliberate misconduct. Cultural and structural barriers reduce the likelihood of early detection, allowing fraud to remain undetected until it escalates to a serious level.
References
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., Albrecht, C. O., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2019). Fraud Examination (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Comments :